PubMed 35665758

PubMed ID: 35665758

View on PubMed
Genome-wide specificity of plant genome editing by both CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN.
Authors: Bessoltane Nadia, Charlot Florence, Guyon-Debast Anouchka, Charif Delphine, Mara Kostlend, Collonnier Cécile, Perroud Pierre-François, Tepfer Mark, Nogué Fabien
Journal: Scientific reports (Sci Rep), Vol.12(1), 2022‑Jun‑04

DOI: 10.1101/gr.229202 PMCID: PMC187518

Abstract
CRISPR and TALENs are efficient systems for gene editing in many organisms including plants. In many cases the CRISPR-Cas or TALEN modules are expressed in the plant cell only transiently. Theoretically, transient expression of the editing modules should limit unexpected effects compared to stable transformation. However, very few studies have measured the off-target and unpredicted effects of editing strategies on the plant genome, and none of them have compared these two major editing systems. We conducted, in Physcomitrium patens, a comprehensive genome-wide investigation of off-target mutations using either a CRISPR-Cas9 or a TALEN strategy. We observed a similar number of differences for the two editing strategies compared to control non-transfected plants, with an average of 8.25 SNVs and 19.5 InDels for the CRISPR-edited plants, and an average of 17.5 SNVs and 32 InDels for the TALEN-edited plants. Interestingly, a comparable number of SNVs and InDels could be detected in the PEG-treated control plants. This shows that except for the on-target modifications, the gene editing tools used in this study did not show a significant off-target activity nor unpredicted effects on the genome, and did not lead to transgene integration. The PEG treatment, a well-established biotechnological method, in itself, was the main source of mutations found in the edited plants.
Publication Types
Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Related Articles